When
this course began, I was apprehensive to say the least. I doubted my ability
and qualifications to conduct legitimate research. After weeks of study and
compilation of simulation components I would love to say that I underestimated
myself on many levels. Unfortunately, I don’t feel that strongly that I have
reach that plateau yet! I’m not saying that I am incompetent at research; I
just don’t possess that confidence yet.
On the
other hand, I have gained a great deal from this course: from the basic
terminology that still at times causes confusion but more often results in a
deeper understanding to the subtle nuances of design that can be the
determining factor between success and, well, less than valid findings. I more
clearly understand the differences between qualitative and quantitative and
still have a strong conviction that a mixed method would most likely be my choice, despite the topic. I am far too statistically challenged to confine
myself to numbers and calculations and much too creative to rely exclusively on
“chasing rabbits” to a relatively desired outcome. It will take a bit of both to
create an outline that is both focused enough to be advantageous and interesting enough to hold my
attention and motivation for completion.
Moreover,
one of the most beneficial tidbits that I will take away from this class is
that I don’t have to be a published author in a highly prestigious journal to
be considered a researcher – what I do daily to ensure that the children in my
care receive the most appropriate and stimulating early education that I
can facilitate is, for now, my ongoing contribution to the world of research.